Libyan reality… sweep the needs of clarity

The bear of the rise of the crisis, due to the Libyan policy failure, Libya transition to democratic representation with polar political factions on the sovereignty of the Libyan state after the Arab Spring.

Libyan society paid an unprecedented price in the history of Libya between the armed militias of Libya, the conflict between the men of political Islamists, the men of the former Libyan political system and parties of former Libyan opposition figures, whom they undermining the internal security in Libya, which affected the Libyan national economy and weakened government institutions operating in Libya.

This imbalance of security presence inLibya is to facilitate terrorist groups sneaking into the entry of the Libyan territory, which led to the current Libyan governments lack the capacity for effective governance of the country and the provision of basic services in all parts of the Libyan nation.

The Libyan state needs a peaceful advancement of communication between the conflicted Libyan groups in the face of enormous challenges to reform weak governmental institutions, to the transformation of the economy that is faltering to provide humanitarian services to the crisis of Libyan citizens.

The path may lead a new era, an era differs in any other era since the convening of the Arab Islamic American summit inRiyadh and its war on terrorism in the Arab region in particular.

It was during the last period of the Libyan arena political struggle between several parties backed by Libyan militias with weapons for the purpose of sophistication in the authority and control of the destinies of the Libyan state, did not reap this political conflict and after years of time, made only split between the two executive authorities.

The middle to the interim government in the east coast ofLibya and the West has a government of reconciliation and centers collapsed with this division of sovereignty to reflect the real political disaster that befell the country multi-ideological ideas of a faltering of the Libyan state.

The political doctrine, from which those who have inspired the Libyans, was not promising although there is so much said about the good intentions behind the Agreement Moroccan, the role of political parties agreed, rising from behind a chaotic line of Libyan foreign policy failures.

But Governments can in the Libyan conflict, including the realization of the role required to achieve the Libyan national security and assisting the Libyan public institutions in the management of oil and gas, for the purpose of advancing economic development in favor of the Libyan people growing national economy and improve the standard of living inLibya.

There has been a collapse of the Libyan national economy when it is exorbitant and lack of liquidity and the ability of the simple citizens to buy basic foodstuffs, materials, with the severe lack of wages and salaries available to Libyan banks.

Series of Egyptian military operations took place in the east of the city ofDerna to hit sites of Libyan terrorist camps and destruction under the pretext of the rapid response of the Egyptian Air Force, Egypt has violated Libyan national sovereignty.

What is more regrettable, is the current situation between the two Governments a form of a weak to hope and the possibility of improving relations between them to benefit Libya in Al-hard from political disaster dysfunction, the economic conditions that are increasing with the collapse of the value of the Libyan dinar against other foreign currencies.

It is not impossible to accept from major countries such as theUnited States of America, the European Union, and even Russia to provide full political cooperation for the strategic necessity of the Libyan people unless Libya consolidates its central sovereignty in a unified government on the Libyan national scale.

Libya's foreign policy must move in its policy towards the participation of neighbors in their security ambitions from the extremist groups that constitute chaos and instability in their countries.

As for the Libyan governments, which are in conflict with each other, they only reflect the misjudgment and wisdom of things and the dangerous course that puts Libya in the grip of external control over the policies and orientations of the contemporary Libyan state.

It is clear that the Libyan politicians today do not want to move towards building constitutional institutions that work to create a permanent constitution in the Libyan state and work on the development of a new political system that works on the unity of sovereign institutions under one political framework and one central government under one banner in one homeland called the contemporary Libyan state.

By Professor Ramzi Mavrakis

By Professor Ramzi Mavrakis